SPX Straddle - 66 DTE - Manage Profits at 45%

In this post we look at the backtest results of selling a one-lot, at-the-money (ATM) straddle on the S&P 500 Index (SPX), initiated at 66 days-to-expiration (DTE).  In this fifth post of five on 66 DTE straddles, we look at trades that use the same loss exits as shown in the first post, and in addition, take profits at 45% of the credit received.  The results displayed in this post represent data from 832 individual trades entered by the automated backtester.

For background on the setup for the backtests, as well as the nomenclature used in the charts and tables below, please see the introductory article for this series: Option Straddle Series - P&L Exits.

In the trade metrics tables, some of the metrics rows have been highlighted to indicate values that are in the upper half of the readings.  One of the metrics to note is the average P&L per day in percentage terms (P&L % / Trade - Avg. P&L / Day).  This is a measure of the P&L per day normalized to the maximum initial portfolio margin (initial PM) required for that trade run...it tells us the effectiveness of theta with respect to our margin requirement.  Also note that the y-axis scale is the same in all of the 66 DTE equity curves.

No IV Rank Filter

In this section we look at the results of entering one trade for every monthly expiration regardless of the implied volatility rank (IVR) of the SPX on the date of entry.  Entering these trades at 66 DTE and utilizing our loss exits and 45% credit exits (described here), resulted in the equity curves below.  These curves are very similar to the variations without profit management, covered in the first 66 DTE post.

(click to enlarge)

The trade metrics for these different exits are shown in the table below.  The (175:45) variation stood out with the second best P&L % / day reading, the highest P&L % per trade reading, the highest total P&L % value, and the highest win rate (of 69%).  Three other variations also had win rates of 69%.  Compared to the corresponding metrics for the 59 DTE variations, the P&L % per trade and total P&L % are better.  But, the corresponding 59 DTE variations had better P&L % per trade readings and win rates.

(click to enlarge)

The table below shows the distribution of returns in five-number summary format.  Hat-tip to tastytrade.

(click to enlarge)

Below are three sets of scatter plots for selling 66 DTE ATM SPX straddles. The first image contains one scatter plot per strategy and shows P&L in percentage terms versus IVR for the SPX. The IVR was captured on the day each trade was initiated.  The trend of increasing P&L with increasing IVR is very clear.

(click to enlarge)

The next image shows P&L in percentage terms versus initial ATM IV. This ATM IV was captured on the day each trade was initiated.  Higher IV resulted in higher returns, but the majority of the profitable and unprofitable trades occurred at lower IV...below 35.

(click to enlarge)

The third image shows P&L in percentage terms versus days-in-trade (DIT).  In order to extract 45% of the credit, the trade duration needs to be longer...this is clearly evident with the clustering of profitable trades above 40 DIT.  At the higher loss management levels, 100% and greater, most of the losses were realized at expiration.  This is the same pattern we noticed with the 59 DTE trades using the 45% win management level.

(click to enlarge)

IV Rank > 50% Filter

In this section we will look at the results of entering one trade for every monthly expiration only when the IVR of the SPX is greater than 50% ( >50% ).  Entering these trades at 66 DTE and utilizing our loss exits and 45% credit exits (described here) resulted in the equity curves below.  These are the best returns for the 45% credit exit for all of the DTE tested up to this point.

(click to enlarge)

The trade metrics for these different exits are shown in the table below.  As we've seen with the earlier articles, there are significantly fewer trades that meet the >50% IVR criteria...23 out of 104 possible trades.  The top variations (highlighted in yellow) had higher P&L% per day readings, higher P&L% per trade values, better win rates and larger profit factors than the non-IVR filtered variations.  Also, in general, the top performers managed losers quickly...at the 75%, 100%, and 1255% loss levels.  The best performer of the group was the (75:45) variation.

(click to enlarge)

The table below shows the distribution of returns in five-number summary format.

(click to enlarge)

IV Rank < 50% Filter

In this section we will look at the results of entering one trade for every monthly expiration only when the IVR of the SPX is less than 50% ( <50% ).  Entering these trades at 66 DTE and utilizing our loss exits and 45% credit exits (described here) resulted in the equity curves below.  These filtered trades have had a very good run all of 2015, but starting as early as mid-2013...this is a familiar patter for this IVR filter level.

(click to enlarge)

The trade metrics for these different exits are shown in the table below.  Using the lower IVR filter did not improve any of the metrics.  The best performer of the group was a tie between the (175:45) and (200:45) variations.

(click to enlarge)

The table below shows the distribution of returns in five-number summary format.

(click to enlarge)

In the next post I'll summarize the automated backtest results of the 66 DTE ATM SPX short straddles, before moving on to the 73 DTE straddle series.


Follow my blog by email, RSS feed or Twitter (@DTRTrading).  All options are available on the top of the right hand navigation column under the headings "Subscribe To RSS Feed", "Follow By Email", and "Twitter".