For background on the setup for the backtests, as well as the nomenclature used in the charts and tables below, please see the introductory article for this series: Option Straddle Series - P&L Exits.
No IV Rank Filter
In this section we will look at the results of entering one trade for every monthly expiration regardless of the implied volatility (IV) rank of the SPX on the date of entry. Entering these trades at 38 DTE and utilizing our loss exits and 25% credit exits (described here), resulted in the equity curves below.
(click to enlarge) |
The trade metrics for these different exits are shown in the table below. The (100:25) variation stands out with one of the top P&L % / day readings, highest overall P&L %, and a decent win rate. The (50:25) variation was also a top performer.
(click to enlarge) |
The table below shows the distribution of returns in five-number summary format. Hat-tip to tastytrade.
(click to enlarge) |
Below are three sets of scatter plots for selling 38 DTE ATM SPX straddles. The first image contains one scatter plot per strategy and shows P&L in percentage terms versus IV rank for the SPX. The IV rank was captured on the day each trade was initiated. As we noticed in the last article, there is a clear trend of increasing P&L with increasing IV rank.
(click to enlarge) |
The next image shows P&L in percentage terms versus initial ATM IV. This ATM IV was captured on the day each trade was initiated. Higher IV resulted in higher returns, but the majority of the profitable trades occurred at lower IV.
(click to enlarge) |
The third image shows P&L in percentage terms versus days-in-trade (DIT). We see the same two patterns that we observed at 10% profit management...when managing losses early (25%, 50%), the losses were fairly evenly distributed across DIT. As the loss management becomes less aggressive (150% and higher), we see that the losses are concentrated above 25 DIT.
(click to enlarge) |
IV Rank > 50% Filter
In this section we will look at the results of entering one trade for every monthly expiration only when the IV rank of the SPX is greater than 50% ( >50% ). Entering these trades at 38 DTE and utilizing our loss exits and 25% credit exits (described here) resulted in the equity curves below.
(click to enlarge) |
The trade metrics for these different exits are shown in the table below. There are significantly fewer trades that meet the >50% IVR criteria, but the P&L% per day readings are much higher at the lower loss levels (25%, 50%, 75%). We observed this pattern with the 10% profit management also. The win rate is 85% for all variations, except for the 25% loss management level.
(click to enlarge) |
The table below shows the distribution of returns in five-number summary format.
(click to enlarge) |
IV Rank < 50% Filter
In this section we will look at the results of entering one trade for every monthly expiration only when the IV rank of the SPX is less than 50% ( <50% ). Entering these trades at 38 DTE and utilizing our loss exits and 25% credit exits (described here) resulted in the equity curves below.
(click to enlarge) |
The trade metrics for these different exits are shown in the table below. Using the lower IVR filter did not improve any of the metrics other than the total P&L %.
(click to enlarge) |
The table below shows the distribution of returns in five-number summary format.
(click to enlarge) |
In the next post we will look at the backtest results of 38 DTE ATM SPX short straddles using the same loss thresholds as above, but with profit taking occurring at 35% of the credit received.
You can follow my blog by email, RSS or Twitter. All options are free, and are available on the top of the right hand navigation column under the headings "Subscribe To RSS Feed", "Follow By Email", and "Twitter". I follow blogs by RSS using Feedly, but any RSS reader will work.
4 comments:
Hi Dave, Excellent work as always, thank you. Out of interest, will you incorporate the sharp sell off in August into your backtests at any point?
Best,
Mark
I incorporate new data in my published backtest results only when I start a new series.
Since I started publishing the Straddle test results before the September expiration, these results will not include the August drop.
Thanks,
Dave
Dave, is it possible to backtest the results of rolling losses which reach a certain amount, 25%, 50% etc, to the next expiration? Rolling seems to be one of the main loss mitigation techniques that are used, but I haven't seen any studies done on them. Even at Tastytrade, of which I am a fan.
Hi Yoshi,
That is an area that I will look into in the future.
Automated backtesting of rolling is a bit complicated though. The way I will implement it is to size the roll based on cost to close out the original trade. This brings up an issue when calculating margin percent though, since the increased position size of the new trade will cause the denominator in the % return calculations to change. Normalizing these numbers across a trade run then becomes a challenge. Additionally, an approach to roll trade selection would need to be variable. Would you roll from a 6 delta to a 6 delta or from a 6 delta to a 4 or 8 delta. Another factor to consider is days remaining...would your decision to roll be based on days remaining...I would think so...and how would this number impact the delta selection of the new rolled trade.
There are other factors to consider as well...but I think you get the point...it's not as straight forward as putting on a new strangle.
Thanks,
Dave
Post a Comment